Every program review cycle produces the same chart: a line of award counts going down, and a conversation that follows the line. The number fell, so something is wrong. The question is what, and whether the fall is about the program or about the field.
Those are different questions, and the public data can separate them. We compared two-year changes in national award counts against the projected growth of the occupations each program feeds, for 113 programs where both figures exist.
That does not mean those programs are healthy. It means a falling award count, on its own, tells you almost nothing about whether the field is contracting.
What the two signals actually measure
Award counts come from IPEDS: how many credentials a program conferred nationally. They measure supply — how many institutions chose to produce graduates, and how many students chose to enrol.
Occupational projections come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics: whether the jobs those graduates enter are expected to grow. They measure demand.
Supply and demand move independently. A program can shrink because the field is dying, or because the institution cut it, or because a competing program absorbed its students, or because the credential stopped being the route into the job. Only the first of those is a demand problem, and the award count cannot distinguish them.
The largest divergences
These are programs where the award count fell sharply while the occupation grew. The gap column is the distance between the two signals.
| Program | Awards, 2yr | Occupation growth | Awards 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actuarial Science | −38.2% | +2.7% | 1,303 |
| Pharmacy | −22.2% | +17.4% | 12,167 |
| Health Administration | −9.8% | +24.2% | 28,250 |
| Statistics | −10.1% | +21.2% | 6,859 |
| Applied Mathematics | −8.9% | +21.4% | 3,844 |
| Hospitality Management | −24.2% | +5.6% | 7,999 |
| Nutrition | −20.5% | +6.3% | 3,006 |
| Economics | −24.2% | +1.8% | 19,703 |
Award change: IPEDS completions, all award levels, 2021 to 2023. Occupation growth: BLS Employment Projections 2025–35, employment-weighted across the occupations the NCES CIP–SOC crosswalk assigns to each program.
Pharmacy is the clearest case. Its award count fell 22% in two years while the occupations its graduates enter are projected to grow 17%. If you read only the first number, you would conclude the field is contracting. The second number says the opposite.
The eight where the signal is real
The value of separating the two signals is that it makes the genuine warning cases visible. Eight programs had both a falling award count and flat or shrinking occupational demand:
| Program | Awards, 2yr | Occupation growth | Awards 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| German | −23.4% | −0.1% | 632 |
| French | −22.2% | −0.1% | 1,335 |
| Spanish | −18.0% | −0.1% | 6,465 |
| Journalism | −17.8% | −1.4% | 9,089 |
| English | −15.9% | −0.2% | 32,166 |
| Paralegal | −10.7% | −0.1% | 9,455 |
| Music | −5.0% | −0.2% | 10,105 |
| Elementary Education | −1.5% | −0.3% | 41,754 |
These are the programs where a declining award count and a flat labour market point the same way. That is a prompt to look closely — not a conclusion, but a place to start.
Why this matters for a program review
A program review that reads only completions will flag 61 programs. One that reads completions against occupational demand flags 8, and can say why the other 53 look different.
That difference is not academic. Closing or consolidating a program is slow, expensive, and hard to reverse. Doing it on a single declining line — when 87% of similar declines sit in growing fields — is a decision made on half the evidence.
There is a second question underneath this one, and it has a different answer. A falling award count can mean programs are being withdrawn, or it can mean the same programs are producing fewer graduates. IPEDS records the institution count alongside the award count, so the two can be separated. In a companion analysis, 32 of the 61 programs above were offered by the same number of institutions or more — and the median institution count did not move at all.
What the data cannot tell you
Three limits are worth stating plainly, because they bound what any of this can support.
- These are national totals. Your program's own trajectory may differ substantially from the national picture. A national decline does not establish that a specific program is weak, and a national rise does not establish that it is strong.
- Occupational projections are not forecasts of demand for graduates. They describe whether the occupation is expected to grow, not whether employers will hire from this credential. The CIP–SOC mapping is many-to-many and imperfect, and some fields are mapped poorly.
- Neither figure knows your mission. A program can be small, declining, and essential. Nothing here measures mission fit, quality, cost, or the reason a student chooses the program.
This is decision support, not a decision. It is a way to ask a better question at the start of a review, not a way to end one.
For the wider method behind this — the five questions a review needs, and why we do not compress them into a single score — see what a program review actually needs to know.
Check your own program
We produce a written viability assessment for a single program: completions against occupational demand, state-level projections, graduate earnings where they exist, and every figure traced to its source and vintage. The first one is free.
Request an assessment for your program →
About this analysis
113 programs where both an IPEDS award series and a BLS occupational projection exist. Award change is all award levels, 2021–2023, from IPEDS completions via the Urban Institute Education Data Portal (ODC-By v1.0). Occupation growth is employment-weighted projected change 2025–35 from BLS Employment Projections, using the NCES CIP–SOC crosswalk. IPEDS 2020 is excluded because it is a near-exact duplicate of 2019 in the published data; 2023 is provisional. Prepared by True Heading Collective LLC. Every figure is reproducible from the public sources named.